-
BOURDIEU’S HOMO ACADEMICUS
- Author(s):
- Irfan Ajvazi (see profile)
- Date:
- 2022
- Subject(s):
- Sociology
- Item Type:
- Article
- Permanent URL:
- https://doi.org/10.17613/kg2t-9q28
- Abstract:
- Bourdieu argues that political inclination is dependent upon one's position in the academic field, and not vice versa. Distinguishing between three hierarchically arranged fields of power, he places the academic field in a middling position between the political and social fields. He posits a hierarchy of the faculties, in which those at the top are closer to political power. Bourdieu supports his argument using empirical data gathered through publicly available sources, presented in tabular form. University professors, Bourdieu argues, are subordinate in the field of power to managers of industry and business, but are nonetheless "holders of an institutionalized form of cultural capital," and therefore culturally dominant with respect to writers and artists (36). These academics, especially those at the top of the social hierarchy, present higher percentages of "indices of social integration and respectability" (36-37). According to Bourdieu, two antagonistic principles of hierarchization are at play in the university field: "the social hierarchy, corresponding to capital inherited and economic and political capital
- Notes:
- BOURDIEU’S HOMO ACADEMICUS
- Metadata:
- xml
- Published as:
- Journal article
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 12 months ago
- License:
- Attribution
bourdieu.pdf