-
The Climactericity of Peer-Review
- Author(s):
- Carlo Morelli (see profile)
- Date:
- 2021
- Subject(s):
- Universities and colleges--Graduate work, Research, Research--Methodology, Research--Evaluation, Digital humanities, Methodology, Publications
- Item Type:
- Article
- Tag(s):
- Dissertations, doctoral training, Humanities doctorates, peer review, PhD
- Permanent URL:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/4feg-vg32
- Abstract:
- A rigorous apologia for peer-reviewed literature for doctoral research. Articles which lack peer-review are objectively less valuable. According to Adamek (2015), peer-review is climacteric; that is, peer-review represents the most central and vital criteria in selecting scholarly writing to include in dissertation research. Indeed, a 2021 study conducted by Gupta, Bhatia, Pathak, & Raman concluded peer-review was the most essential search filter for doctoral research queries.
- Metadata:
- xml
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 3 months ago
- License:
- All Rights Reserved
Downloads
Item Name: 
topic_3_dq_1_res-815-0503_morelli_08212021.pdfDownload View in browser Activity: Downloads: 19
