Skip to content
  • About
    • HASTAC Scholars
    • Conferences
    • Staff
    • History of HASTAC
    • Leadership
    • Core Values
  • Go To…
    • Members
    • Groups
    • Sites
    • CORE Repository
  • Help & Support
  • Organizations
    • HC
    • ARLIS/NA
    • AUPresses
    • MLA
    • MSU
    • SAH
Register Log In
HASTAC Commons
  • Teaching Freedom: Exclusionary Rights of Student Groups

    Author(s):
    HC Admin (see profile) , Joan W. Howarth
    Date:
    2008
    Group(s):
    MSU Law Faculty Repository
    Subject(s):
    Civil rights, Discrimination--Law and legislation, Constitutional law, Educational law and legislation, Youth--Legal status, laws, etc., Sex and law, Constitution (United States)
    Item Type:
    Article
    Tag(s):
    exclusionary, student groups, U.C. Davis L. Rev., FacPubs, Civil rights and discrimination, Education law, Juvenile law, Sexuality and the law, First Amendment
    Permanent URL:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/hfc2-ax80
    Abstract:
    Progressive, antisubordination values support robust First Amendment protection for high school and university students, including strong rights of expressive association, even when those rights clash with educational institutions' nondiscrimination policies. The leading cases addressing the conflicts between nondiscrimination policies and exclusionary student groups are polarized and distorted by their culture war context. That context tainted the leading authority, Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, and is especially salient in the student expressive association cases, many of which are being aggressively litigated by religious groups with strong antihomosexuality goals. The strength of these First Amendment claims can be difficult to recognize in this context. Dean Howarth attempts to hold new ground, in which protecting the First Amendment association rights of exclusion by even antihomosexual student groups is consistent with a deep commitment to improved justice for sexual minorities. Dean Howarth discusses the leading high school and law school cases, and presents the strong First Amendment doctrinal analysis that should control. She critiques as weak the equality claim at stake in preventing a faith-based student group from limiting its membership and officers to adherents of that faith.
    Metadata:
    xml
    Published as:
    Journal article     Show details
    Pub. Date:
    1/1/2008
    Journal:
    University of California Davis Law Review
    Issue:
    42
    Page Range:
    889 -
    Status:
    Published
    Last Updated:
    2 years ago
    License:
    Attribution-NonCommercial

    Downloads

    Item Name: pdf facpubs13fulltext.pdf
      Download View in browser
    Activity: Downloads: 8

    Back to Deposits

Archives

  • September 2022
  • February 2022

Categories

  • Collaboration
  • Connected Learning
  • Environment & Sustainability
  • K-12
  • Pedagogy
  • Uncategorized
  • Visual Arts & Design

Recent Posts

  • Hello world!
  • Guggenheim-y
  • Teach Like a Club: Virtual Reality & Art Therapy
  • The Power of Um
  • Hybrid of a Hybrid: Chimera Teaching?

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
HUMANITIES COMMONS. BASED ON COMMONS IN A BOX.
TERMS OF SERVICE • PRIVACY POLICY • GUIDELINES FOR PARTICIPATION
This site is part of the HASTAC network on Humanities Commons. Explore other sites on this network or register to build your own.
Terms of ServicePrivacy PolicyGuidelines for Participation

@

Not recently active