• Open Citations and Open Peer Review: Toward a Better Thresher in Scientific Literature (Preprint)

    Author(s):
    Arthur Boston (see profile)
    Date:
    2019
    Group(s):
    Library & Information Science
    Subject(s):
    Open access publishing, Science, Research--Evaluation
    Item Type:
    Article
    Tag(s):
    journal impact factor, open citations, open peer review, Open access, Open science, Research impact, Scholarly communication
    Permanent URL:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/xxxw-df46
    Abstract:
    Open Peer Review and Open Citations need advocates. Open Access recently received significant boosts in organized support (Redalyc announcing AmerliCA; cOAlition-S announcing Plan S). Within a similar timeframe, two other events occurred that need coordinated consideration: the ASAPbio group issued a letter in favor of Open Peer Review (OPR), and a Workshop for Open Citations (OC) was held to educate and discuss OC. While Open Access may be on the horizon, the related issue of research assessment will remain. This article takes the opportunity of these simultaneous events to explore how Open Citation and Open Peer Review could be key components toward reformed evaluative practices.
    Notes:
    Preprint Version: 5.16.2019. Manuscript Currently Under Review. Original Manuscript Submitted September 17, 2018 to Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication.
    Metadata:
    xml
    Status:
    Published
    Last Updated:
    4 years ago
    License:
    Attribution

    Downloads

    Item Name: pdf open-citations-and-open-peer-review_-toward-a-better-thresher-in-scientific-literature-boston-2019-preprint.pdf
      Download View in browser
    Activity: Downloads: 207

    Back to Deposits