• “Modernity as Imaginary, Modernity as Tool: Is There a Way Forward?” [in Russian: “Modernost’ kak voobrazhaemoe, modernost’ kak instrument: Est’ li dvizhenie vpered?”]

    Author(s):
    Michael David-Fox (see profile)
    Date:
    2016
    Subject(s):
    Nineteenth century, Twentieth century, Russia, History, Soviet Union
    Item Type:
    Article
    Tag(s):
    modernity, interdisciplinary debate, 19th century, 20th century, Russian history, Theory
    Permanent URL:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/M6VF58
    Abstract:
    NLO discussion: David-Fox's response to the commentaries on “Russian-Soviet Modernity: None, Shared, Alternative, or Entangled?” [in Russian] by 11 anthropologists, literary scholars, political scientists, and historians (Timur Atnashev, Andy Byford, Alexander Etkind, Bruce Grant, Catriona Kelly, Ilya Kalinin, Kirill Kobrin, Stephen Lovell, Alexander Markov, Douglas Rogers, Mark D. Steinberg, Mikhail Velizhev).
    Notes:
    NLO [New Literary Observer], no. 140 (fall 2016): 79-91.
    Metadata:
    xml
    Published as:
    Journal article     Show details
    Publisher:
    NLO
    Pub. Date:
    fall 2016
    Journal:
    Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (NLO)
    Volume:
    no 140
    Issue:
    140
    Page Range:
    79 - 91
    Status:
    Published
    Last Updated:
    6 years ago
    License:
    All Rights Reserved

    Downloads

    Item Name: pdf david-fox-nlo-modernity-responses-2016.pdf
      Download View in browser
    Activity: Downloads: 155

    Back to Deposits